Gordon Fee and the intellectual deference of a New Testament scholar.

There are occasional Bible commentaries that have a long shelf life, and then there are those that are hacked out to meet the voracious appetite of publishers for niche series. The carbon footprint of commentary mania is brontosauran in its scale. There are currently around 125 biblical commentary series in production in various North Western World publishers. You can see them here if you click on Series button on the upper menu bar. I'm not sure whether to describe this as ludicrous, wasteful, exegetical overkill, marketing madness, unbiblical abuse of creation gifts, or just plain stupid. But out there somewhere people are buying them, seduced by claims of niche market, latest scholarship, and that underlying assumption that if the book is about the Bible it must be justified.

So. When I buy a new commentary now (it was not always thus for me), I have to have a good reason. It has to give me what I don't have and really need. The fact that it rehearses what everyone else has said, or the concern to defend particular positions, or the claim that it now adds a different perspective isn't enough. Nor do I want a commentary that forecloses exegetical options because the publisher takes a particular theological line – and that goes both for the conservative and the critical.

N2401288745_2814 For the discerning commentary reader and user there are certain names that are the gold standard. Gordon Fee is one. Now Professor Emeritus of New Testament Exegesis at Regent's College Vancouver, he is a retired Pentecostal scholar of singular standing across the denominations. His exegetical honesty, focused erudition, rigorous scholarship, and crisp no nonsense writing style laced with fun and gentle critique of others' positions, make him a joy to read. His First Corinthians and Philippians are amongst my most used volumes – I've read them both and used them constantly. His two massive exegetical studies of the Holy Spirit (God's Empowering Presence) and of Christology (Pauline Christology) as well as his up-front honest exegesis of the Pastoral Epistles, are full of help for those who want to break sweat doing some exegetical excavations.

514zH8ZWD-L._SL160_AA115_ So now I am slowly reading my way through his newest volume on the Thessalonian Epistles. I'm going to blog on Fee once a week for a while – just highlighting what makes him interesting, reliable, for me the commentator of choice on any book he chooses to work on. And not because he is always right, or says what I'd like to confirm my own exegetical prejudices; but because he is to be trusted with a text, which he treats with an intellectual deference that nonetheless tolerates the hard questions. And because he knows when to expose nonsense, question unexamined assumptions, and link up creative connections across the range of the Bible, while making sure that pastors and preachers, scholars and enquirers see both the wood and the trees, and learn to love the view. Tomorrow a few characteristic quotes from Fee to show that all the above isn't just another sales pitch for another commentary to take up further space in an already overpopulated market. 

Comments

8 responses to “Gordon Fee and the intellectual deference of a New Testament scholar.”

  1. Craig avatar
    Craig

    Hi
    thanks for the ref to his commenatry on i Cor.
    I’m considering a series on this letter for next year … any other commentaries you would recommend?
    Craig

  2. Craig avatar
    Craig

    Hi
    thanks for the ref to his commenatry on i Cor.
    I’m considering a series on this letter for next year … any other commentaries you would recommend?
    Craig

  3. Jim Gordon avatar

    Hello Craig. Tony Thiselton’s big NIGTC is the benchmark now but is too unwieldy for preaching – 1400 plus pages. he did a shorter version which is intended as a pastoral and preaching resource and I used it last year on sabbatical – very good. Recommended – along with Richard Hays in the Interpetation series. So Fee, the user friendly smaller Thiselton, and Hays. If you can get to a theological library there might also be Fitzmyer in the Anchor series (which I like), Barrett as the older volume in the Black’s series, and I think he still has good pentrating theological comment. The other commentator I have used extensively on 1 Corinthians is David Garland in the Baker Exegetical series. This is a very fine co,,emtary but I enjoy Garland as a commentator nearly as much as Fee. So embarrassment of riches – but the three mentioned above should do it!

  4. Jim Gordon avatar

    Hello Craig. Tony Thiselton’s big NIGTC is the benchmark now but is too unwieldy for preaching – 1400 plus pages. he did a shorter version which is intended as a pastoral and preaching resource and I used it last year on sabbatical – very good. Recommended – along with Richard Hays in the Interpetation series. So Fee, the user friendly smaller Thiselton, and Hays. If you can get to a theological library there might also be Fitzmyer in the Anchor series (which I like), Barrett as the older volume in the Black’s series, and I think he still has good pentrating theological comment. The other commentator I have used extensively on 1 Corinthians is David Garland in the Baker Exegetical series. This is a very fine co,,emtary but I enjoy Garland as a commentator nearly as much as Fee. So embarrassment of riches – but the three mentioned above should do it!

  5. Richard L. Floyd avatar

    Thanks for this. I’m at the book giving-away stage of life rather than the book accumulating one, but on my overburdened shelves of commentaries Fee’s offerings have always had a place. And I have the greatest respect for him, in that years ago he was dismissed from Gordon-Conwell Seminary for refusing to sign a statement of faith he couldn’t agree with. That was a sad chapter in this now fine school, but Fee modeled courage and gave up his job rather than shrug and sign. In my own more liberal tribe I have often recommended him and been asked, but isn’t he really conservative and a Pentecostal? The answer is that good exegesis is no respecter of labels.

  6. Richard L. Floyd avatar

    Thanks for this. I’m at the book giving-away stage of life rather than the book accumulating one, but on my overburdened shelves of commentaries Fee’s offerings have always had a place. And I have the greatest respect for him, in that years ago he was dismissed from Gordon-Conwell Seminary for refusing to sign a statement of faith he couldn’t agree with. That was a sad chapter in this now fine school, but Fee modeled courage and gave up his job rather than shrug and sign. In my own more liberal tribe I have often recommended him and been asked, but isn’t he really conservative and a Pentecostal? The answer is that good exegesis is no respecter of labels.

  7. Craig avatar

    Thanks for this Jim, I had already opted for the ‘easy’ version of Thiselton
    Craig

  8. Craig avatar

    Thanks for this Jim, I had already opted for the ‘easy’ version of Thiselton
    Craig

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *