I'm going through one of my regularly recurring Paul phases, probably stimulated by the imminent arrival of N T Wright's desk buster 2 volume magnum opus on Paul and the Faithfulness of God. The hype surrounding Wright's "Paul" is understandable, and understandably overstated. There are plenty other substantial, significant, scholarly and in their day, groundbreaking studies of Paul, an apostolic succession into which Wright is now rightly co-opted. W D Davies, H N Ridderbos, F F Bruce, E P Sanders, J D G Dunn, J C Beker, E Kasemann, Udo Schnelle, M Gorman, are only some in a succession of serious attempts to understand, interpret and illumine the mind of St Paul.
When it comes to commentaries on Paul's letters, some of the most dedicated, imaginative and disciplined scholarship of the last 50 years has pored over and been poured into exegesis of Pauline texts. In my own lifetime Barrett, Cranfield and Dunn on Romans, (a Durham Trinity plus of course Wright himself who was Bishop of Durham), Fee then Thiselton on I Corinthians, Furnish and Harris on II Corinthians, Martyn on Galatians, Markus Barth and E Best on Ephesians, O'Brien on Philippians, Dunn on Colossians, Malherbe on Thessalonians and Marshall on the Pastorals. There is something about the mind of Paul that defies the best efforts of those who want to get at 'the centre' of his thought, who look for coherence and system and tidiness.
So I was heartened by these words in and essay on Paul :
"Accepting the fluidities of Paul's statements means accepting a certain amount of ambiguity. This is helpful in restraining us from imposing our modern penchant for precision on his thought. That is, a thinker's ambiguity is precisely part of his or her thought structure."
R Scroggs, "Salvation History", in Pauline Theology, vol. 1, Ed. Jouette Bassler, Fortress 1994.
And given that Paul himself recognised he had been entrusted with proclaiming the mystery of the ages and the unsearchable riches of Christ, and whose doxological theology is both invitation and warning that the grace of God defies human categories and the love that surpasses knowledge, eternally and essentially eludes the capture of human concepts. It may be that what we can only apprehend partially, and articulate falteringly, means that our theological and exegetical explorations ought to be hospitable to ambiguity rather than certainty, and conducted with humility rather than alacrity. In the end, doxology
Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God!
How unsearchable his judgments,
and his paths beyond tracing out!
34 âWho has known the mind of the Lord?
Or who has been his counselor?â
35 âWho has ever given to God,
that God should repay them?â
36 For from him and through him and for him are all things.
To him be the glory forever! Amen.
(The photo looks across Loch Skene, a late autumn evening while watching migrating geese. Nothing at all to do with Paul – just a photo of a favourite place.)