During these sabbatical months I've quietly pursued my interest in conversations that might be possible between theology and poetry. I am interested in how the different approaches of these two disciplines can be mutually enriching to matters of life, truth and meaning. As a theologian-pastor I've long felt it important to listen to voices that speak in a different tone, from other perspectives, about life, truth and meaning. I know such pastorally responsive listening includes philosophy, the sciences, ethical and social reflection, and cultural voices in music, film and other media. But it's the particular discipline of poetry that currently fascinates me; and by discipline I mean human creativity bent to artistic purpose for the common good.
Now I recognise that such a view of poetry could become reductionist and utilitarian, a form of theological imperialism that wants to lay tribute on whatever can be used to theological advantage, without thought of poetry's right to self-determination. At the same time though, there are undoubtedly poets whose work flows from inner depths of experience that resonate profoundly and sympathetically with theological concerns. When theology makes comprehensive truth claims the poet more modestly demurs, "instead of saying that's true, I could say, there's truth in that…" This altogether more tentative approach to the world and our experience,is rooted in responsible and responsive openness to what is seen, listened to and cared about. This makes the poet an important reference point for theological convictions, which without pastoral rootedness and lived actuality ossify into truth claims lacking that purchase on human embodiedness that alone gives them credibility.
What does the systematic theologian make of Seamus Heaney's claim that the poet "enters and explores and exceeds himself by entering and exploring and exceeding the language"? The Word became flesh and dwelt among us – that is, the truth of God, embodied in the Word made flesh, entered, explored and exceeded all the languages of human life. Theology therefore exists as a process of articulation happily and necessarily incapable of ultimate success – likewise poetry. Both poetry and theology are only possible on the understanding that articulation of our ultimate concerns is proximate, provisional – because the perfect poem is not so much the one that pins truth down in final form, but the that which enables truth to be transformative of how we see the world and how therefore we henceforth and now live in the world. Here's Heaney again talking of what he had hoped for one of his poetry collections:
The poet's role, and the gift of her poetry, is to enable the reader to journey towards a clearer view of their place in the world, because they see the world differently. That might equally serve as a vitalising vision of a genuine pastoral theology, in which words about God are carefully shaped and spoken, where journeys are undertaken together, and when in the miracle of life and truth, human transformation is earthed in that grace ad infinitum which was embodied in the Word made flesh, and which is given as the light of every person.
"…the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness comprehendeth it not"
Our language neither comprehends by intellectual control, nor encompasses by systematic constructions, nor extinguishes by exhaustive explanation. From the poet the Christian theologian could learn intellectual and spiritual attitudes more in keeping with the source and style of Christian theology in the Incarnation. Kneeling before mystery, waiting in contemplative trustfulness, giving voice to questions of justice, meaning and faithful living, pushing outwards the boundaries of faith and understanding – and always in language not fully up to the task, but within which all stories must be told.
In yesterdays post (below) I mentioned the inaugural meeting of what I called 'The Baptist Theological Study Group'.
A fuller post at the College blog prompted several questions from Margaret which make it important to clarify what is envisaged. Here is Margaret's comment / questions, and the response I posted on the College blog. I am answering only for myself as the occasion is being organised by Andrew Rollinson – but in our conversations about it I have a good idea of what Andrew is envisaging and hoping for.
Margaret
"What's the Scottish Baptist
Theological Study Group? Where and when do they meet? Who is "in the
group"? How do you get to be "in the group"? Just curious….."
My reply
The
name is provisional Margaret – and likely to change because it's hard
to avoid words like 'group', 'society', but they have a kind of closed
feel to them that is entirely unintended.
The initial meeting was set up by Andrew Rollinson, our Ministry Advisor at the Baptist Union of Scotland, by an email
circular inviting expressions of interest – not sure who was on that
first list. But the intention is to get such a discussion forum under way and make it into
an inclusive place for creative reflection, responsible discussion and
respectful listening about issues and themes important for the ongoing
life and health of Baptist thought and practice.
At this first meeting, as well as the lecture, we hope a broader
discussion will help clarify what we want to be about, and how best to
develop through thoughtful, informed discussion together, Baptist ways
of thought and practice that arise out of such a process of theological
reflection.
So I guess the invitation is to all those who are open to and
supportive of the intended ethos of "an inclusive place for creative
reflection, responsible discussion and respectful listening about
issues and themes important for the ongoing life and health of Baptist
thought and practice". At this stage it is only being initiated – what
it becomes will largely be determined by those who want to make this
journey together.
My personal conviction is that such a shared journey can only be taken if the journey itself is inclusive and welcoming, accessible and jargon free, contextually sensitive but challenging, and therefore enabling practice which arises out of shared learning 'in the school of Christ'; and that such a journey of learning and discovery means our willingness to travel together in conversation, companionship, and commitment to live together 'under the rule of Christ'.
Hope that helps with the 'just curious' questions –
for which many thanks!