Saved by Grace – A Lesson in Lifelong Learning

"By grace you are saved, through faith, and that not of yourself, it is the gift of God."

Well, that's me put in my place. What's needed is trust, not competence, grace not discipline, gift and definitely not personal achievement. Of course as a long time Christian I know all this; as a veteran disciple I know all about following and the daily obedience of taking up the cross; like a long term prisoner I'm now a trusty, one of the experienced followers, a seen most of it before disciple, a been there done that and learned the lessons kind of person. Saved by grace, yes, absolutely.

But if I'm honest, my recongition of, dependence on, trust in, gratitude for, astonishment and embarrassment at, this scandalously patient, uncompromisingly generous, disturbingly subversive, endlessly mysterious grace which is the gift of God, and the self donation of Eternal Love in Christ, is so far beyond my capacities of thought and emotion, that it's sometimes easier just to get on with life and try to be faithful, and accept my limitations, failures and mistakes as the way it is and has to be.Grace is just too complicated, or maybe too simple.

There is a Pelagian instinct that wants to carry my share of the burdens, and perhaps a residual pride not that far removed from Peter who promised to follow, never to deny or forsake, and whose best intentions tripped him up as he stumbled and fell on the tragic path that led to the High Priest's courtyard. Trust is such a difficult disposition; an expensive risk to take; a reckless commitment with no guarantees; a surrendering of control from hands used to steering ourselves. So that even the act of trust, the emotional and mental readiness to say yes to the call of Jesus, feels like an effort, something we must do, a piece of hard work on which our all depends.

And that's when Paul's words come with their liberating power and we hear the clink and clatter of falling chains. By grace….through faith….not of yourself….the gift of God. I doubt if we ever reach a stage when those words lose their power to contradict our pride, heal our anxious performance oriented devotions, renew with a different energy our frantic, or complacent walking in the footsteps of Jesus. And you know, that's as it should be. For the gift of God is the gift of God himself, promised presence, sufficient grace, love incognito, the goodness and mercy that follows us, with patience and hopefulness, bearing us up when otherwise we would fall.

Denise Levertov, in a short poem, expresses the reality of a life thus borne up, and her words are a call to the risk of trust, and perhaps to the trusting of risk.


DSC00996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Avowal, Denise Levertov.

As swimmers dare
to lie face to the sky
and water bears them,
as hawks rest upon air
and air sustains them,
so would I learn to attain
freefall, and float
into Creator Spirit’s deep embrace,
knowing no effort earns
that all-surrounding grace.

Comments

6 responses to “Saved by Grace – A Lesson in Lifelong Learning”

  1. Bob MacDonald avatar

    One of the difficulties I am wrestling with is the opposition of law and grace in Paul. ‘Law’ cannot be the teaching I have encountered in the Psalms. There is such a love for Torah there. Equally, antinomianism is impossible, for God is not a God of disorder. Perhaps the original difficulty lies in the Greek translation of Torah as nomos and the subsequent failure to see the inner heart of ‘teaching’ as the poet of Psalm 119 sees it.
    Perplexed as to explanation.

  2. Bob MacDonald avatar

    One of the difficulties I am wrestling with is the opposition of law and grace in Paul. ‘Law’ cannot be the teaching I have encountered in the Psalms. There is such a love for Torah there. Equally, antinomianism is impossible, for God is not a God of disorder. Perhaps the original difficulty lies in the Greek translation of Torah as nomos and the subsequent failure to see the inner heart of ‘teaching’ as the poet of Psalm 119 sees it.
    Perplexed as to explanation.

  3. Bob MacDonald avatar

    One of the difficulties I am wrestling with is the opposition of law and grace in Paul. ‘Law’ cannot be the teaching I have encountered in the Psalms. There is such a love for Torah there. Equally, antinomianism is impossible, for God is not a God of disorder. Perhaps the original difficulty lies in the Greek translation of Torah as nomos and the subsequent failure to see the inner heart of ‘teaching’ as the poet of Psalm 119 sees it.
    Perplexed as to explanation.

  4. Jim Gordon avatar

    Hello Bob Your latest comment on Law and grace, and the miss match between the Torah in Psalms and Paul’s polemical use of the Law is I think a neglected discussion within the arena of the new perspective. The same incongruence is met in Luther’s antipathy to ‘The Law’ and his love for the Psalms. The New Perspective exponents, from Sanders, to Dunn, to N T Wright argue ( for me persuasively) that Lutheran and many Reformed v iews on Jewish Law are caricature, or are built on what were ultra snesitivities to Law amongst certain Jewish groups. The overall sympathy and rehabilitation of Jewish piety apparent in the New Perspective are much nearer, I think, to the positive joy and human flourishing attendant on the Psalmists’ devotion to the Law. In other words, obedience of the Law is about love for God, and love for Torah, and delight therein is to be engaged in the most positive relationship with the Lord as obedience and gratitude answer to the grace and mercy of God. This isn’t so much an explanation Bob, as the way I too try to hold to a strong theology of grace, in which Torah (which is so much more than ‘Law’) becomes a style of discipleship such that following Jesus and obedience to Torah are not religiously opposed alternatives.

  5. Jim Gordon avatar

    Hello Bob Your latest comment on Law and grace, and the miss match between the Torah in Psalms and Paul’s polemical use of the Law is I think a neglected discussion within the arena of the new perspective. The same incongruence is met in Luther’s antipathy to ‘The Law’ and his love for the Psalms. The New Perspective exponents, from Sanders, to Dunn, to N T Wright argue ( for me persuasively) that Lutheran and many Reformed v iews on Jewish Law are caricature, or are built on what were ultra snesitivities to Law amongst certain Jewish groups. The overall sympathy and rehabilitation of Jewish piety apparent in the New Perspective are much nearer, I think, to the positive joy and human flourishing attendant on the Psalmists’ devotion to the Law. In other words, obedience of the Law is about love for God, and love for Torah, and delight therein is to be engaged in the most positive relationship with the Lord as obedience and gratitude answer to the grace and mercy of God. This isn’t so much an explanation Bob, as the way I too try to hold to a strong theology of grace, in which Torah (which is so much more than ‘Law’) becomes a style of discipleship such that following Jesus and obedience to Torah are not religiously opposed alternatives.

  6. Jim Gordon avatar

    Hello Bob Your latest comment on Law and grace, and the miss match between the Torah in Psalms and Paul’s polemical use of the Law is I think a neglected discussion within the arena of the new perspective. The same incongruence is met in Luther’s antipathy to ‘The Law’ and his love for the Psalms. The New Perspective exponents, from Sanders, to Dunn, to N T Wright argue ( for me persuasively) that Lutheran and many Reformed v iews on Jewish Law are caricature, or are built on what were ultra snesitivities to Law amongst certain Jewish groups. The overall sympathy and rehabilitation of Jewish piety apparent in the New Perspective are much nearer, I think, to the positive joy and human flourishing attendant on the Psalmists’ devotion to the Law. In other words, obedience of the Law is about love for God, and love for Torah, and delight therein is to be engaged in the most positive relationship with the Lord as obedience and gratitude answer to the grace and mercy of God. This isn’t so much an explanation Bob, as the way I too try to hold to a strong theology of grace, in which Torah (which is so much more than ‘Law’) becomes a style of discipleship such that following Jesus and obedience to Torah are not religiously opposed alternatives.

Leave a Reply to Bob MacDonald Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *