Blog

Tuesday night was a milestone night for me. The College organised a retirement dinner to celebrate my years as Principal of the Scottish Baptist College. (This cake shows me in characteristic pose speaking lots of words!)

These have been eleven years of hard work, ministry fulfilment, richly rewarded by the evidence of students discovering the transforming power of theological study, formative learning, practical training and all this in a shared community focused on God, open to the Holy Spirit, centred on Christ, and committed to finding out what it means to follow faithfully after Jesus.

It was for me a night when I felt humbled and proud, and hopefully each of these at the appropriate moments. To hear the testimony of students to their own decisive shaping and self-discovery during their time at College, was reason enough for gladness and gratitude. That they were willing to speak so warmly and gratefully about my own role in that process was more than enough reason for humility undergirded by a sense of immense privilege, and if it is ever right to be proud, then yes, that too. But only in the sense of feeling that whatever I had offered as gift to them was hardly adequate to the trust they had shown in entursting their training for ministry into our care, a deep gratitude to God for all that has been accomplished in the learning and teaching, shaping and forming, that is the core commitment of our College.

I was able to pay tribute to a remarkable group of people who serve the Scottish Baptist College – Rev Dr Stuart Blythe, who is now acting Principal, Rev Ian Birch, lecturer in biblical studies and much else, Joyce Holloway, Bursar and PA to the Principal, Isabella Stevenson, promotions and publicity, Rev Dr Edward Burrows and Frances Addis who together look after our library. The fun and banter, the commitment and dedication, the care for each other and for the students, have made our College a healthy place of learning and teaching which is student centred in its ethos and goal.

I was presented with a magnificent framed silk painting of the Paisley skyline, a glass clock and a cheque, three gifts, the three-ness may or may not be related to my known preference for all things Trinitarian! The frame was too big to fit in a full car so it will be brought home next week – and I'll post a picture of it then. And Sheila was given a stunning orchid bowl which now sits in tropical splendour at our fireplace!

I will continue teaching one day a week at the College in the coming year, but once the dust settles, will take time to reflect, to read, think and pray, before deciding what might be the next stages of ministry and service, within the church and beyond.

“I can't change the fact that my paintings don't sell. But the time will
come when people will recognize that they are worth more than the value
of the paints used in the picture.”

How poignant is that? If only he could have known. A year or two ago the best episode ever of Dr Who imagined what it would be like to go back to Van Gogh's time and tell him how famous he would become, how admired his art would be, and how revered as an artist. It finished with Van Gogh transported into the future to observe the adulation of visitors to the Van Gogh museum admiring his paintings.

Real life isn't like that. He died poor, unrecognised and his paintings largely unsold. His work is now essentially a collection of masterpieces – even minor paintings are of major importance, and there's little point now in talking of monetary value. Just keep adding zeros. So the finding of a new full size landscape, confirmed as an authentic Van Gogh, is cause for celebration and gratitude from everyone whose world is the richer for the work of Van Gogh.

The letters written by Vincent to his brother Theo reveal much of the inner life of this remarkable, tortured genius. He repeatedly talks of the importance of love, the inner springs of imagination, art as both passion and tedium, and the stars, the importance of the stars as guides not only for his feet, but more significantly for his heart. "When I have a terrible need of, shall I say – religion? Then I go out and paint the stars."

 And he knew about risk, anxiety, failure and rejection. At times he can be almost stoic in responding to his own anguish, and finding in it possibilities otherwise unavailable. “The fishermen know that the sea is dangerous and the storm terrible,
but they have never found these dangers sufficient reason for remaining
ashore.”

His paintings remain, for me at least, texts of comfort and solidarity, sermons in symbol and colour, and as in all great art, a summons to see, to attend and to be changed.

and

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-24014186

Simon Schama is a genius. But that's not his greatest gift. There are few broadcasters whose erudition translates so beautifully into education by conversation, learning by contagious passion, and for once a creative balance between scepticism and faith, or to put it in other terms the complementarity of an hermeneutic of suspicion and an hermeneutic of trust. The new BBC1 series on the Story of the Jews began last Sunday evening and goes for a further 4 weeks. 

I remember doing history of the Ancient Near East, the history and religion of Israel, and a wide ranging introduction to the Hebrew Bible as part of my Arts degree at Glasgow University – there I encountered an hermeneutic of supsicion, and little patience in the classroom with trust as faith commitment. I revisited some, but not much of that material in my theological education, this time in a College where trust and faith commitment were part of the hermeneutical process. Of course this was without ignoring or demeaning the gains from critical scholarship, with respectful practice of a disciplined critical and historical analysis of text, culture and context, and as part of a multi-disciplinary subject-field that was diverse and required an approach to learning we would now call integrated.

So this first episode was a treat. From the sceptical reflections on the absence of hard histoirical, archaeological evidence for the Exodus, to the sequence of family scenes at Passover celebrated in Schama's own household, to the ecstatic and passionate love for Torah, for words and for reading and for the scrolls, that is utterly characteristic, essential, to Judaism – this was wonderfully captured in the scenes at the synagogue. This is superb television; more than that it is a first class education at an accessible level in what it means to be a people of faith, albeit a faith diverse, historically rooted in change and continuity, and that continuity despite repeated persecution measurable on a scale stretching from ridicule to the Holocaust. 

I don't always agree with some of the premises, or conclusions of the programme, but that is only judging by the first episode. We will wait and see what is still to come. But I look forward to sitting down with time and attentiveness in what is a master class in contemporary education that aims at heigtened awareness of issues, balanced provision of information, posing of questions that compel reflection rather than make-do answers, and that brings a world different from mine alive, with sympathy, insider knowledge, humour and Schama's geuine greatness as a scholar whose learning elicits admiration, and invites engagement with his world of thought.

I've begun to notice unmistakable signs that the world is getting worser and worser.

You go to park in the supermarket bay and someone has abandoned their trolley because it would be a life threatening inconvenience to take it to the trolley bay.

A litter control executive at the roundabout is on a pair of steps using a litter grabber to reach into the high bushes and retrieve plastic carrier bags flapping like ripped sails or birdless synthetic wings.

Jogging along my favourite path (where the yellowhammer sang for a few weeks during the summer), there are seagulls in the flowering currants – that's because someone left their half eaten fish supper, complete with polystyrene tray dumped into the bushes.

All three of these actions betray a profound ingratitude, and therefore a deeply pervasive selfishness. No, I'm not a grumpy old man, nor a disillusioned moralist, nor an anachronistic Pharisee, nor someone whose primary research is into other people's bad habits. The connection between selfishness and ingratitude is confirmed if you consider: having had the money to fill the trolley with food, and the convenience of wheeling it out to the car, which is parked in a bay that wasn't obstructed by someone else's trolley – why? – tell me why – would you decant your food into the car and drive away and stuff the next person who needs the car bay? Sometimes I ask myself, "How can people do that?" or "What goes on in a mind that, if its lack of thought were universalised, would make the world unworkable, and community impossible?

How do carrier bags get snagged on trees in the middle of a roundabout? Somebody first took them from a supermarket. If you could follow the paper trail – in this case the plastic trail – all the way back from roundabout, to household or car, to shop – somebody somewhere was careless, or couldn't care less. Unsightly on a roundabout, carrier bags are deadly near animals, in rivers and especially the sea. These are all places from which we get food. So the trolley and the carrier bag are reasons to be grateful – glad and thankful that we have the money, the food the transport and the security not to be hungry. Would we be more careful if we were more grateful?

Which brings me to the half eaten fish supper, the waste of food, the messing up of the countryside, and the thought once more – what actually goes through a mind at the point of jettisoning food and rubbish where someone else will have to clean it up? I know, it's a quaint slightly daft question, but, how easy woulod it be to throw food away if we had first said Grace and thanked God for it; or if we thought that the world is gift, responsibility, its beauty to be  nurtured, its life to be respected, its health to be protected?

Amongst the important practices of Christian witness is embodied demonstrable gratitude, a disposition of thankfulness, an evident awareness of life as blessing, a carefulness and carefreeness with food that both relishes its taste and respects its necessity – for us and for everyone else.And not only gratitude – because out of gratitude flows generosity, which is fatal to selfishness!

Returning the trolley is an act of consideration for the community; abandoning it is one more act of community corrosion.

High profile litter is really a waving of our carelessness in our faces, a symbol, perhaps even a sacrament, enacting the way we waste our world.

The calories of a jumbo fish supper would be enough to keep two people alive for another day if they could somehow be transferred digitally to refugee camps and famine areas elsewhere in this rich but unequal world, and turned back into food.

So here's a missional question – how do followers of Jesus demonstrate in a world of abandoned trolleys, high flying carrier bags, and half eaten fish suppers, a life of grateful generosity and careful responsibility and imaginative compassion? 

By the way, a flower like the above is a reminder of how much in this beautiful world is gift – gratuitous, generous, gratifying gift.

Amongst the many tributes and obituaries to Seamus Heaney, this one by Malcolm Guite is both personal and worthy of the stature of a man who claimed no stature other than a poet.

‘Sing yourself to where the singing comes from’: Remembering Seamus Heaney

Will purest silence

be found in the still, deep heart

of the greatest sound?

Michaela osc, A Little Book of Haiku (Community of St Clare).