Blog

  • “…the hospitable hearted, spiritually exercised Evangelical…”

    0_post_card_portraits__jrre_pursey_ ‘Get yourselves into a relation of indebtedness to some of the great writers of the present and the past…..’ The advice of Principal Alexander Whyte to New College Students, in a lecture on Thomas Goodwin, a Premier League Puritan, later published in Thirteen Appreciations. I am an admirer of Alexander Whyte for many reasons, though well aware he may be too Victorian for some tastes; psychological moralism, occasions when sentiment and scolding get in the way of persuasive insight, and all the time his fascination, in almost equal terms, with both sin and grace.

    But at his best Whyte has the dazzling, glimmering presence of Scheihallion, (his favourite Scottish mountain) covered in snow. In his sentimentality there isn’t a whiff of insincerity, and in his scolding there is the unmistakable solidarity of pastor with people, of scolder with scolded. And one of the main reasons I admire this Victorian Free Kirk preacher, is because he explains why I have long valued the writings of the most famous 20th century Trappist monk, Thomas Merton. And if you think a Free Kirk minister, who was Moderator of his church, who was Principal of its most influential College, and who for decades filled the pulpit of the Free Church’s most influential Edinburgh church, might raise a hoary eyebrow at a Baptist minister who is also Principal of a Denominational College claiming his support for such a reason – you’d be wrong and you’d be surprised.

    In the volume referred to Alexander Whyte wrote appreciations of thirteen Christian writers. As a Scottish Presbyterian Calvinist you’d expect Samuel Rutherford and William Guthrie the Fenwick Covenanter, and the New England Puritan Thomas Sheppard, to be ‘appreciated’. And Thomas Goodwin the Puritan was Whyte’s theological and spiritual mentor-in print – he read Goodwin so much the books had to be rebound in leather to withstand the wear and tear of a reader who lugged such tomes around with him while on holiday in the Highlands. But Whyte’s appreciation reached much further afield – he wrote one of the most penetrating reviews of the sermons of Cardinal John Henry Newman, and as a younger man visited this celebrated Roman Catholic Convert at the oratory in Birmingham. His appreciation of Teresa of Avila was reviewed in The Tablet and read in religious communities as the lunchtime sacred reading. His review of father John of Kronstadt took him into the Russian Orthodox tradition where he sensed the importance of bowing to mystery, gazing on the beauty of holiness and lifting the heart in passionate and unembarrassed devotion to God.

    Merton1 So what’s the connection between Alexander Whyte and my appreciation of Thomas Merton? Quite simple – Whyte urged those who would preach and pastor others to be a "true Catholic…a well read, open-minded, hospitable hearted, spiritually exercised Evangelical", and to be "in a relation of indebtedness" to those who on the journey with God are further down the road than I will ever be. At many important turns in my own journey, Merton has been one of those who knew the road better than me. As a guide he has helped me map some of my own inner geography, that changing landscape of the soul where psychology, spirituality and the reality of God provide the raw material of my own humanity in Christ. Over many years few writers have taught me better than Merton, the importance of knowing myself known, loved and called by God, to serve Him open of mind and heart to the truth and the presence of God in all of life.

    Whyte understood as few others in his age did, the damage done to the Gospel of Jesus, the mission of the church, and our personal spiritual development, by misguided and exclusive loyalty to the one narrow strand of the Christian tradition to which any of us happens to belong. Evangelicalism has been a tradition that, perhaps as a defensive buffer zone, developed strands of intolerance, its own list of no go theological areas and traditions, its in-built hermeneutic of suspicion that simply does not trust other traditions to be as ‘sound’, as ‘biblical’, in their understanding, interpretation and living of the truth of Christ. My own heart has never settled for such exclusiveness. Instead, like Alexander Whyte, A W Tozer, Thomas Goodwin, John Wesley, Richard Baxter and many, many others who stand either in Evangelicalism, or in the earlier traditions from which it emerged, I have put myself ‘in a relation of indebtedness’ to great souls of the Christian tradition, and been taught so much by those guests I have made welcome companions on my own journey.

    This Baptist then, has learned a lot I needed to know about loving God without pretence, from Merton the Trappist. But I’ve also learned how not to limit the range and depth of the love of God in Christ from the medieval Julian of Norwich and the Methodist Charles Wesley. The studied devotional precision of Anglican George Herbert, the astringent but healthy questioning of the Welsh priest R S Thomas, the verbal virtuosity in service of spiritual certainty and uncertainty of the Jesuit Gerard Manley Hopkins, continue to teach me the importance of words in conversation about God, more especially in conversation with God. But these are other stories, for other times.

    For now, over Christmas, I’m re-reading The Seven Storey Mountain, surely one of the 20th Century’s genuine spiritual classics. Not least because it is a frank, flawed and distilled account of spiritual emptiness and hunger, and of the remorseless mercy that pursues us with gracious and loving intent.

  • A year ago today – in memoriam.

    2003_0924image0040_2 A while ago I posted a photo of my father lying  in front of our farm cottage, resting with our working collie, before going to do the evening milking. It’s a year ago today since my mother died. I don’t mark this day as an expression of sadness, but as a day of thankfulness. The obvious self-interested gratitude of a son to the one who gave him life – but  gratitude also that in my mother I was given a remarkable gift.

    In a culture that has grown used to benchmarks as standards of quality, she benchmarked several human qualities that I now value and try with varying degrees of success or frustration to live towards.

    Generosity that could be reckless but never calculating.

    A capacity for work that lived up to one of her own greatest compliments -‘not a lazy bone in her body’!

    Laughter that revealed a sense of humour always sharp, but never cutting.

    Courage to bear and forbear an illness that often undermined her deepest sense of self.

    Compassion for others that was neither ashamed of tears nor afraid of the cost of helping.

    A love for animals that was Schweitzer-like in its reverence for life.

    An instinct for the circumstances of others that made her alert to those small, random acts of kindness we all like to have happen to us.

    My mother also had her faults – I recognise some of them in me. But today I simply celebrate a life to which I owe my own, and incalculably more besides.

    Requiescat in pace.

  • Aberdeen 4 FC Copenhagen 0

    1908 There’s a time to be humble, to not gloat, to be self-deprecating, to shrug the shoulders apologetically and apologise for not doing what everybody expects; a time to remember that pride goes before a fall, to consider the feelings of others and refrain from crowing.

    This isnae wan o’ them, though!!!

    Aberdeen 4 F C Copenhagen 0

    At the end of a glorious evening of solidarity with the Dons, exhausted by the emotional and physical cost of kicking every ball (while lying supine on the sofa, occasionally hiding behind a cushion) we emerge not only as winners, but 4 -0. Christmas will be an anti-climax now, unless somebody can think opf something better than 4-0!

    Anyway, not to go on about it, but I would like to place on record my appreciation for the efforts of the Aberdeen team this evening, my admiration for their earnest endeavours, my complete endorsement of their tactical awareness, and my absolute incredulity that when I play back the recording there are indeed four goals and I wasn’t dreaming. So, to avoid being tediously repetitive, if I may reiterate briefly…..4-0!!!!!!!!!

    Best corny line from the commentary: referring to the AFC management team, "There’s the three wise men – Jimmy Calderwood, Jimmy Nicholl and Sandy Clark – and they’re looking for a star tonight!"

    Time to say my evening prayers, which tonight will be 4 thanksgivings and 0 complaints. 4-0, get it?

  • Rationalisation, excuse making and library fines

    Dscn0068 Today I had another one of those threatening but courteous reminders about an overdue library book. Just so that I know, and don’t forget, and therefore will be in the words of the Authorised Version, "inexcusable O Man!", I am being reminded of the cumulative nature of the library fine system, and being forewarned that I may soon face my very own personal credit crunch. Thing is, the book cost £4 about 12 years ago, so unless I return it soon I will be paying the purchase price without actually buying it. Then again, why not just return the thing – but life’s been too busy and a wee fine seems a fair trade-off to attend to other priorities. Or why not renew it online. Well, can’t renew it online once it has hit the fine trajectory.

    But the genius of the cumulative fine system is that it pushes returning the book up the priority list, the speed of ascent directly proportionate to projected expense. I have found by previous experience that mitigating circumstances have neither relevance nor purchase power with the library staff. The same courtesy that informs the tone of the emails is discernible in the non-negotiating, smiling but unyielding insistence that, yes indeed, you do owe an arm and a leg, and until you pay it, the amount increases at an alarming rate. And once it reaches a certain level of impressive indebtedness, your library access will be suspended.

    So, as well as last minute Christmas shopping, and as a contribution to peace on earth and goodwill amongst all people, I’m going to return the blessed book, pay my dues, wish the librarian a happy Christmas, and maybe even include a wee box of chocolates for those vigilant guardians of literature, scholarship, literacy and culture. Anyway being charged for keeping a book longer than the agreed borrow date isn’t so much a fine, as a legitimate rent payment, a modest charge for the hire of educational input, huh? Rationalisation – one of the more obvious signs of excuse making, when to re-quote Paul, "You are inexcusable, O man!" I’m off to the library……….

  • University, education and millionaire shortbread

    Millionairesshortbreadcookies_2 Waiting in the queue for my Chai Tea Latte (aye, dead sophisticated me!) a colleague from the University came over and we debated about the pros and cons of going halfers on a 2 inch square of millionaire shortbread. Now I’ve sat on Learning and Teaching Board, on Validation Panels and on various other ruminative, deliberative and generally talkative committees with this colleague – and none of the debates were as animated as our discussion about whether the base should be shortbread or cheesecake in content and texture; how thick the caramel should be relative to chocolate; and whether either of us was prepared to admit to cleaning out the condensed milk can when millionaire shortbread was being made at home. Now that’s what I call an academic discussion, a robust exchange of viewpoints, a collaborative forum in which the discussion outcomes were no less significant than some of the other discussions we have had to witness / participate in / sound informed about.

    In the end we decided to leave the discussion at the level of theory, though with an assumed action point that post-Christmas, the discussion should be resumed with the acknowledgement on both sides that a firm conclusion may only be achievable if the differing opinions were subjected to practical testing (tasting).

    Amazing how you learn what you learn these days at University.

  • Hopeful Imagination – go look!

    I have been blogging today at Hopeful Imagination. Elizabeth Jennings’ Carol for 2000 has important things to say about preventing the past from determining our future. Memory can be an important perspective, a way of holding on to significant expereince – it can also be a block to newness, an obscuring of fresh possibility, a silencing of voices which invite us into the future. Go look here.

  • Another dividing wall of hostility

    Here is a picture by Banksy that carries a similar message to the prvious post, about Bethlehem, nativity and the realities of militarised politics. The picture is its own comment, sermon, and prayer

    Thanks to my friend Duncan for the link.

    75951388_54b06f4cf7_2

  • Christmas, nativity and dividing walls of hostility

    Nativity_set_2This is one of the most unsentimental nativity scenes I’ve ever seen. The dividing wall, the spy-holes too high to see through, the key people excluded from the manger – wish I knew where to buy one. The concrete wall, which some call a necessity and others an obscenity separates Jew from Palestinian, and is a scandal – in the technical sense of a stumbling block, the place where hope and humanity are tripped up, the obstacle that halts progress.

    And the angels sang, ‘Peace on earth and goodwill to all peoples…but we still strain to hear that angel song. And every time we give ourselves to peace-making, and every-time we slowly dismantle those walls which have been built, in our family, where we work, in that place where we live, and in the wider world, – brick by brick, hurt by hurt, wound by wound, we work away at those far too numerous walls of enmity and hostility, those ancient hatreds and daily resentments, those scandals, which in the end have to be removed by the scandal of God come amongst us as the crucified God – in whom God was reconciling the world to himself….breaking down dividing walls of hostility….

  • Autism and Religion Symposium

    Accedbod This weekend I am in Aberdeen (Bridge of Dee in photo!), attending the multi-disciplinary symposium on Autism and Religion. Over two days we will discuss a very wide range of papers from various professional perspectives – theological, psychological, neuro-biological, religious phenomenology, and from people from several different faith traditions. The papers reflect both the area of expertise of the participants, but also aim at enabling the wider discussion by a cross fertilisation of knowledge, ideas, and experiences.

    .

    Central The symposium is under the auspices of the centre for Spirituality, Health and Disability and is held at King’s College, University of Aberdeen. There is an important element of humility and reserve required in such a symposium, not least because this complex human experience is explored almost exclusively by people who are not themselves diagnosed as being on the Autistic spectrum. Autism itself is such a varied and experientially diverse condition that it includes people whose autism is so severe they require others to be their advocates, while it also includes people well able to speak for themselves, and indeed to be advocates for other people with autism. And between these, many, many people who live their lives with great courage and perseverance, both people with autism and their carers and helpers.

    My own interests are rooted in personal and pastoral friendships with families where one or more people have autism. My personal theological commitments raise important issues about how we relate to others who perhaps do not have the sense of connectedness we too easily assume in others, and in our working definitions of community, identity and spirituality. So my paper is entitled ‘Is a Sense of Self Essential to Spirituality?’ This is part of a wider set of questions I am currently thinking through as a theological reflection on the nature of our humanity, and how we think of ourselves and others, how we think of God and how God is experienced, how we respond in gestures of redemptive and embracing love, to those who because of various conditions, have an impaired sense of self. I am looking forward to listening, exploring, learning, reflecting, and of course talking – but I hope our talking will be at its most creative in the context of significant pastoral and theological care, as issues are identified, and understanding deepened, within the rich texture often only possible in a conversation where minds are both receptive and generous.

    Later in the week, when thought has clarified I’ll post an update.

  • Aehrenleserinnen_hi Worship

    is a way of seeing the world

    in the light of God.

    .

    Prayer may not save us

    but prayer makes us worth saving.

    .

    There is a task, a law and a way;

    the task is redemption,

    the law to do justice and to love mercy,

    and the way is the secret of being human and holy.

    .

    The wisdom of Heschel…nudged by his thoughts prayer seems less of a chore, and becomes again a viewpoint of the soul. Students sometimes become impatient with our urging them towards theological reflection. No mere academic exercise, but ‘a way of seeing the world in the light of God’. Hard to think of anything more indispensable for responsible, responsive ministry. And ministry too has its task, its law and its way – redemption, justice and mercy, holy humanity. Heschel is a forceful if gentle reminder of the deep Jewish roots out of which Christian spirituality has grown – and away from which it must not grow.