Blog

  • Lent with R. S. Thomas: When Our Prayers Keep God Awake, Now and Forever, Amen.

    Minerva's bird, Athene noctua: too small for wisdom, yet unlike it's tawnier cousin active by day, too, its cat's eyes bitterer than the gorse petals. But at night it was lyrical, its double note sounded under the stars in counterpoint to the fall of the waves.
     
    *
    There are nights that are so still
    that I can hear the small owl calling
    far off and a fox barking
    miles away. It is then that I lie
    in the lean hours awake listening
    to the swell born somewhere in the Atlantic
    rising and falling, rising and falling
    wave on wave on the long shore
    by the village that is without light
    and companionless. And the thought comes
    of that other being who is awake, too,
    letting our prayers break on him,
    not like this for a few hours,
    but for days, years, for eternity.
    (R. S. Thomas, Collected Later Poems, Bloodaxe 2004. p. 51)
     
    What happens when we pray? What happens to us when we pray? But Thomas explores a more unsettling question: What happens to God when we pray? If prayer is indeed relationship, what kind of relationship can it be? Who is this "Other" that we dare to trouble with our words and thoughts and desires and fears?
     
    Little-owl-1In the stillness of the night there are the noises of the natural world, and hearing has the heightened sensitivity of solitude and the otherwise silent nightscape. Silent except for the two tone cry of the little owl,1 the bird of prey hunting in the darkness, seeing but unseen, dangerously silent; and the bark of the fox, its yelp having the right frequency to carry from distance.
     
    And that other sound so resonant for Thomas, the swell of the waves which originates in oceanic depths beyond imagining, but which then rise and fall and finally break "on the long shore / by the village that is without light  / and companionless." To be "without light and companionless" is a self-description of the priest awake in the small hours; it glints with lucid honesty, distilling into ordinary images and experiences a theologia negativa. But companionless is not the final word, nor is it's time-bound duration assumed to have ultimate permanence. Because there is an other Being, who like the long shore allows our prayers to break on him, and not for the limited duration of a tide in ebb and flow, but forever.
     
    6a00d8341c6bd853ef01b7c8151f49970b-320wiThomas is probing a theological axiom of the impassibility and immutability of God. He is imagining what it must mean that human prayers come from a swell in the deep oceans of humanity in extremis, and they rise and fall, rise and fall, wave on wave, on the long shore of God, not for a few hours but for eternity. Written like that, in prosaic clauses Thomas's speculative theology is startling enough.
     
    But written in the cadences of this poem, those closing lines evoke that strangest of responses, our sympathy for God, who is awake in the night hours, receiving into the reality of who God is, endless waves of human longing, rising and falling, originating in those Atlantic depths of existence beyond human telling, where hope and despair, love and loss, comfort and terror become waves which break on the shoreline of God's eternity.
     
    "There are nights that are so still…". Psalm 121 is a night Psalm, and has a similar image: "He who guards Israel will neither slumber nor sleep." But Thomas has taken that affirmative confident confession of faith to a different level of meaning. This "Other" is, like Thomas himself, unable to sleep; or perhaps unwilling, because letting "our prayers break on him", allowing human longing, desire and need to matter.
     
    220px-PTForsythThen there are these words, written by P. T. Forsyth,2 another pastor theologian impatient with lazy thought and easy answers : "God has old prayers of yours maturing by him…we shall come one day to a heaven where we shall gratefully know that God's great refusals were sometimes the truest answers to our truest prayer. Our soul is fulfilled if our petition is not."3 I think Thomas might have raised an eyebrow at such spiritual confidence, perhaps because Forsyth had pushed too far in imagination into the mind of God, and beyond the mystery of prayers apparently unanswered.
     
    That in turn may be because as well as having a reputation as one of the best read British theologians in contemporary German theology and philosophy, Forsyth was also a deep reader of the Puritan Thomas Goodwin. In one of his treatises, Goodwin has a passage in which he likens God's faithfulness in answering prayer to the conscientious correspondent  who keeps his friend's letters in a conspicuous place until they are answered. Forsyth interpreted the silence of God as neither absence nor indifference to those waves of prayer, but as the wise intentions of love, requiring patience and trust while acknowledging the frustrations of delayed response . 
     
    Thomas refuses such comforting analogies. The two note call of the little owl, the bark of the fox from miles away, imitate the heart hunger of the human lying awake in restless longing. And as counterpoint, the poem finishes with a cyclic climax.God's willing enduring of wave upon wave of prayers is not for hours, or days, but for eternity. Love is eternally vigilant, eternally enduring, eternally willing to bear the prayers of a broken creation. The rhythms of prayer and the waves of grace coincide, and break on the shores of eternity and upon the heart of "that other being, too…"
     
    1. The photo of the little owl in flight is from the website Bird Spot. https://www.birdspot.co.uk/bird-identification/little-owl  The photo of the sea was taken at Aberdeen beach beside the breakwaters on a winter morning!
    2. P. T. Forsyth was a polymath, fully immersed in contemporary intellectual and artistic culture. Born in Aberdeen in 1848. he became Principal of the Congregational College in London. His writings form a remarkable corpus of passionate theology written with urgency to the church of his day always circling round his core conviction that God is holy love.
    3. P. T. Forsyth, The Soul of Prayer. Independent Press, 1949, p.67, 14.  
  • The Rose Window and the Cross

    20230321_124843 (1)Sitting amongst friends from Iran, who are seeking asylum; talking within the limits of two very different languages; laughter, smiles, fist-bumps, tea and home baking, forms of non verbal fellowship; and up there, the rose window, and beneath it the cross.
     
    What brings us together is a common humanity, a gathering beneath a cross and a window made beautiful by light.
     
    Light and life and love, discovered in hospitality and a welcome that begins in the heart and reaches out in imagination, generosity, and promised companionship for the journey.
     
    "Brother, sister, let me serve you,
    let me be as Christ to you:
    pray that I may have the grace to
    let me be your servant too."
  • Lent with R. S. Thomas: “The books stood in rows, sentinels at the entrance to truth’s castle.”

    IMG_3881Perhaps no other experience exposes more effectively the limitations and occasional pretensions of the relatively new academic discipline of practical theology, than the vocational routines of those called to pastoral care, priestly prayer, and the self-giving of daily life in the service of those all too human communities we call the church.

    Thus, I think, R. S. Thomas, who might have been a very difficult student if asked to regard his pastoral encounters as qualitative research using an hermeneutic phenomenology à la Habermas! For, despite all his metaphysical hesitations and theological complaints, his disillusions with ecclesial institution and recurring disappointments with his own fittingness to be a priest, Thomas the priest-poet sometimes nailed it.

    Nailed it! I dislike that contemporary cliché if only on aesthetic lines, especially in a culture more used to mass produced plastic disposables than hand made steel pitons. But in this case I think even Thomas would approve the image – perhaps because when a Christian uses the verb 'to nail', we unwittingly give ourselves a painful mnemonic nudge to look towards the Cross.1 And Thomas was, whatever else we might call him, a theologian of the cross and a despiser therefore of all theologies of glory. 

    His prose-poem account of how he spent his earlier days as a priest in remote and hard to find corners of Wales is enlightening for those who wonder about the relevance of theology, the worthwhileness of thinking, the value of study, and the struggle to read, think and pray, that is the soil out of which pastoral care grows to human fruitfulness.

    "A priest's work is not all stewardship, pastoralia. In a rural parish the time for that is the evening, when the farmer nods over the fire. In the morning, the mind fresh, there is the study, that puzzle to the farm mind. The books stood in rows, sentinels at the entrance to truth's castle. He did not take it by storm. He was as often repulsed as he pretended to have gained ground. And yet…" 2

    6a00d8341c6bd853ef02b751987039200c-320wiI'm not sure I know a better apologia for a discipleship of the intellect, the summons to love God with the mind, the determined duty of thinking as a way of obedience to the God who nevertheless will not be discovered by our cleverness, uncovered by our investigations and interrogations, reduced or categorised by our constructed concepts, or held captive by semantic precision.

    "And yet…" Those last two words represent hope pointing beyond ellipsis to the promise that truth is its own value. And the One who calls us to curiosity and contemplation, to reverent thought and humble study, is the One who meets us time and again at the brook Jabbok and wrestles with us until we are again exhausted and only partially enlightened; "And yet…", we go limping towards the dawn.

    "There is the study, that puzzle to the farm mind." This is in no way intended as a slight to the farmer. Rather it is an explanation to the priest, and a warning, not to expect farmers to understand that time in the study is also a time of ploughing, of seed sowing, of fruitfulness and harvest, a time for ideas to germinate, take root and grow.

    P1000736"The books stood in rows, sentinels at the entrance to truth's castle." Irony? Apologia? I think neither. More an acknowledgement that though working different fields, priest and farmer labour towards a shared goal of sustained human life in the daily round.

    And there is in this prose poem a hint that the farmer's struggling with the elements of rain and wind, frost and sunshine, and the uncertainties of harvest and the worry about making ends meet, these have their equivalent in the study, and in the ploughing and harrowing of ideas. "And yet…"; yes, there is too, in study as in field, the hope of fruitfulness come autumn.

    1.The image is a detail from one of my own tapestries, "Bright Wings". It is based around the Hebrew script of Tikkun Olam, "to repair the world', and on the poem 'God's Grandeur' by Hopkins. 

    2. The Echoes Return Slow, MacMillan, 1988, page 32; and in Collected Later Poems, Bloodaxe, page 27. The Echoes Return Slow is one of my favourite volumes, and the first one I read and re-read 35 years ago now. This was the collection that drew me in.

  • 1 John: A Love Letter to the Church. (Thought for the Day March 20-26)

    P1000673

    Monday

    I John 1.5 “This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. 

    When Jesus stood up at the Feast of Tabernacles and said, “I am the Light of the world”, his disciple John remembered that 50 years later. Light is the source of life, so is Jesus. Light enables us to see the truth, so does Jesus. Light guides us on our way; we don’t know the way ahead of us, but Jesus does, and he is the light ahead of us and the light we walk towards.

    Tuesday

    1 John 1.6-7 “If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth. But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.”

    A hypocrite is someone who pretends to be what they’re not. To say we are a Christian but make a habit of acting unchristianly means we do not do the truth. We are all talk and no action, all claim but no evidence. The true follower of Jesus walks in the light of Jesus and lives in fellowship with other followers. John is saying that the way a person lives should bear scrutiny by others. Otherwise….

    Wednesday

    1 John 1.7 “But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.”

    We can all fail to live out our faith, make mistakes, and behave unchristianly. When John describes our way of life as a walk, he means the overall direction of travel, the things we make a habit of, the recognisable characteristics of the life we live. Sin is to miss the turning, to walk into the shadow, to behave out of character. Such sin is forgiven by the love of Jesus, the light that purifies. God is the Light that searches and heals our brokenness. The Light of the World is life-giving and life-changing. 

    P1000709Thursday

    1 John 1.8-9 “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness”.

    To confess our sins to God is to walk into the light, out of the shadows of guilt, shame, regret, and remembered failure. God is faithful and just – in Christ God has shown that he is on our side, and to be trusted. “There is no sin so deep that His love is not deeper still.” Corrie Ten Boom’s timeless reminder.

    Friday

     1 John 2.1-2 “But if anybody does sin, we have an advocate with the Father—Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”

    Sometimes a hymn is the best commentary:

    “On the mount of crucifixion fountains opened deep and wide; through the floodgates of God's mercy flowed a vast and gracious tide. Grace and love, like mighty rivers, poured incessant from above, and heav'n's peace and perfect justice kissed a guilty world in love.”

    Saturday

    I John 2.3 “We know that we have come to know him if we keep his commands.”

    As straightforward as that. John was remembering 50 years on, the words Jesus spoke after washing the disciples’ feet: “If you love me you will obey what I command.” Love isn’t only emotion and feeling; it is faithful commitment and loving action towards the one we love. And, of course, “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another as I have loved you.” In the life of the church there is not other bottom line.

    Sunday

    1 John 2.  “If anyone obeys his word, love for God is truly made complete in them. This is how we know we are in him: Whoever claims to live in him must live as Jesus did.”

    So there it is. This short letter was once described as “The Tests of Life.” The litmus test of Christian discipleship is to seek with all of our hearts to live as Jesus did. The barcode identifier of a Christian is one who obeys Jesus word. What is being looked for on the spiritual cardiograph, is a growing love for God.

    …………………..

    Kindle, O Lord, in our hearts we pray, the flame of that love which never ceases, that it may burn in us, and give light to others.

    May we shine forever in your temple, set on fire with that eternal light of yours which puts to flight the darkness of this world:

                                                                In the name of Jesus Christ your Son our Lord.

  • Tikkun Olam, Mariupol, and Not Knowing What to pray.

    337009082_764125611615564_4822502247860381649_nThe Hebrew script for Tikkun Olam – "to repair the world." This was the first stage of the tapestry "Bright Wings" which I completed in January 2021. The finished piece hangs above my reading chair.
     
    Tonight I watched the Russian President walking around Mariupol as if he was attending an official opening of some new project. In reality he was in a city that was destroyed on his orders, where hospitals were bombed on his orders, and where the numbers of those killed, injured, and displaced adds hugely to the sum of human suffering inflicted by Russia under this man.
     
    Sometimes we are given unlooked for clarity on the texts we have found the hardest verses of Scripture to interpret. "The Spirit helps us in our weakness. We do not know what we ought to pray for, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groans that words cannot express." (Romans 8. 26)
     
    I've never liked the phrase, "There are no words", when confronted by tragedy. Of course there are words – angry words, truth-telling words, judgemental words, anguished words. More true to say, "I can't think of the right words." And perhaps that's because we are having a hard time interpreting our emotions, and understanding our own thoughts.
     
    That's when Romans 8.26 comes on like a light bulb. Prayer isn't only about our fluency of words and lucidity of thought. Sometimes we offer the Spirit of God space to pray in our hearts with words beyond our knowing and that are beyond human utterance.
     
    The astonishing truth is that the Spirit of God participates in the suffering of creation. God is present in suffering love amongst those whose world is broken, even in Mariupol. I want to pray judgement, punishment, justice – but somewhere deeper than I can possibly know, the Spirit prays within me with the pathos of God, and in words beyond articulation in any human voice.
    Tikkun Olam.
    Spirit of God repair our world,
    repair our hopes,
    repair our communities,
    repair our humanity,
    repair our hearts,
    Tikkun Olam.
  • Peace-making is a Call to Repent of Creating the “Repugnant Cultural Other.”

    LambJesus said, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God."

    I am tired of culture wars. I'm weary of conflicted opinions fuelled by endless anger, contested worldviews excluding each other, and confrontational ideologies as the default of public discourse encountering disagreement.

    Susan harding coined the phrase "repugnant cultural other." It is a neat and ugly description of that process of demonising the other, misrepresenting the argument, refusal to understand the person, and the evacuation of empathy and compassion the better to wound and reject those who think differently, live differently and are different, and therefore a threat to the way we want the world to be.

    As if who and what we are is the norm to be imposed by some form of imperial imposition by the loudest voices and most ruthless strategists. 

    Culture war is a battle for the supremacy of one viewpoint over others, a refusal of tolerance, often accompanied by a self-righteous claim to truth and right. Tolerance is not weakness if it is holding to our own convictions while doing our best to listen, understand, and respect the convictions of others. Intolerance is not always strength; most times it is insecurity with the volume turned up.

    Peacemaking is a call to repent of all that. Not just be sorry for waging war on our own behalf, but to turn away from the very concept of culture as a war. But turn towards what?

    How about turning away from culture war towards the counter-cultural Kingdom Jesus came to announce, inaugurate, and demonstrate in his own ministry? If repentance is a change of direction, then continually and faithfully, I am called to a determined turning away from that inner violence that sees the world as a battlefield, and towards that inner orientation to the peacemaking God.

    Good-samaritan-1000x556For the avoidance of doubt, Jesus said: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God."

    And in case we miss it, Jesus also said: " But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven."

    Then there's this. Jesus' most ardent follower was once his sworn enemy. Paul waged his own culture war against followers of the Nazarene. Until that is, he met the Nazarene called Jesus. Blinded by hatred and his own implacable sense of being right, he was even more and literally blinded by the dazzling intensity of the risen Jesus asking him what the hell he thought he was doing! Hate and hell are siblings.  

    Twenty years later Paul wrote this, unmistakably based on what Jesus said:

    "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written:

    “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord. On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”

    Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good." (Rom 12.18-21)

    Oh I know. Jesus wasn't slow to confront, to contradict, to contest. Gentle Jesus meek and mild is an image of hymn-book imagination. And Paul could also rage and engage in culture war tactics, this time on the side of Jesus and in Jesus' name.

    But. Alongside all the confrontational episodes in Paul's letters, are the ethical constraints which draw their power and motivation from God's love revealed in the crucified Christ, which triumphs in the life-giving life of the risen Lord, and is made effective by the Spirit in the life of the Christian community which is the Body of Christ called to embody the reconciling love of God.

    Kells4I Corinthians 13 is not a nice wee poem about being nice to people; it is a call to a life-discipline of peacemaking by being someone for whom love is the primary norm in following Jesus.

    The fruit of the Spirit in Galatians 5.22 are not unattainable ideals, nor are they a warm and pious wishlist; they are the natural outgrowth of walking in the Spirit of Jesus, the shaping of the character towards Christ-likeness.

    Philippians 2.5-11 describe the self-giving love of One who was in very nature God who emptied himself, took on human form and became obedient to death on the cross.This is not a call to follow Jesus' example of utter self-emptying and self-giving love. How could it be? It's actually part of an argument for peacemaking in the community that is the Body of Christ. "Let this mind-set be yours which was also in Christ Jesus…Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility count others better than yourselves."

    Which brings us back to the Sermon on the Mount with its call to enter the Kingdom of God, to live by the values of that Kingdom, to hear and obey the words of Jesus and live differently, counter-culturally and alternatively to the power games, anxious possessiveness, and competitive rivalries of the prevailing culture which by and large, "doesn't do God."

    Blessed are the spiritually hungry, the sorrowing, the meek, the hungry and thirsty, the merciful, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, the persecuted. These are not the characteristics of the culture warrior, the keyboard warrior, the insecure and intolerant who needs an enemy in order to have an identity over and against this "other". 

    I'm trying to explain what I think and how I feel in the divisive acrimony that has become our established civic and political style. I'm calling in question our way of confronting real and deep issues of cultural health – such as:

    how we treat other people, human like us, who land on our shores in small boats;

    how we are unable to discuss all too human experiences such as those raised by human sexuality and gender identity;

    how far too often, in too many places, we fail to welcome and embrace difference and diversity in the tribes and languages and peoples and nations and cultures and races that make up the human world, Revelation 59-10.  

    how we address the effects of climate change without polarisation and paralysis caused by greed, fear, ignorance, denial, and without allowing the loudest most powerful voices to silence the cries of those whose human future depends on the decisions made by the powerful. 

    PlowshareSo, I go back to the teaching of Jesus, and the wisdom of the Son of God – about loving my neighbour because I love God, about being a peacemaker like God, and about praying, "Your Kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven."

    I for one can't combine the mindset of the culture warrior with the mindset of the ambassador of Christ entrusted with such a ministry of reconciliation. And I have no intention of resigning my ambassadorship. Why? Because "God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself not counting people's sins against them…we are Christ's ambassadors as though God were making his appeal through us." Reconciliation is the identity recognition barcode of those who represent Christ in the arenas where culture wars take place. 

  • The Politics of Mercy.

    P1000711Jesus said, "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy."
     
    Should the teaching of Jesus as, for example, in the Sermon on the Mount, be considered relevant as a standard by which individual Christians and Christian communities judge the policies of the Government of the day?
     
    Is the parable of the Good Samaritan, and Jesus words "Go and do likewise" merely about how I treat other individuals, or is it a principle that guides how human communities are to respond to human brokenness?
     
    The picture is a postcard of a painting of the Sermon on the Mount. It came from a friend who attended the David Hockney Exhibition in 2010, and who has never been persuaded that this Christian thing has much to offer in our current mess. It sits in my postcard holder, which I can see on the shelf behind my computer, any time I can bear to watch the debates in the House of Commons.
     
    So I guess you could say I'm asking for a friend.
  • Lent with R S Thomas: “…love questioning is love blinded with excess of light.”

    There is no surprise that the eucharist is an important theme in the poetry of R S Thomas. Well of course it is, he is a priest, and when all else fails him there is substance and reality in the bread and the chalice. Again and again he alludes to the broken bread and body, the blood of Christ, the Cross and the chalice.  Likewise the sea and in particular its movement and noise, the waves and the wind, the tides ebbing and flowing, the unseen depths of an ocean filled with mystery and dark with secrets.

    The two images of restless sea and celebrated eucharist are brought together in a brief poem

    The breaking of the wave
    outside echoed the breaking
    of the bread in his hands.

    The crying of the seagulls
    was the cry from the Cross;
    Lama Sabachthani. He lifted

    the chalice, that crystal in
    which love questioning is love
    blinded with excess of light.1

    6a00d8341c6bd853ef01bb08b9207e970d-320wiHere, in an ascetic economy of words, Thomas tells the double drama – breaking waves and breaking bread; seagull's cry and Jesus cry of dereliction; sun reflecting on the sea and light radiating from the silver chalice, and the vast ocean and the fruit of the earth and of human hands are each and all enfolded in love.

    This is Thomas at his most devotional, when love is allowed to be perfected as the radiated blessing of the Redeemer Creator. The chalice is "that crystal in which love questioning is love blinded by excess of light."

    So few words, such theological intelligence, an apophatic theology of illumination, an experience of love asking for proof of truth, and being blinded by what it cannot truly or fully ever see or comprehend.

    "The light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not comprehended it", said John in a Prologue whose depth theology caused Thomas's heart to vibrate with sympathy, and with questions. And of that hardest question of all? About whether God's love is believable?

    The answer is broken bread, a seagull's cry, and a crystal clear chalice radiating the light of Creation and Redemption. The beatific vision may well be described in such terms, when "love questioning is love blinded with excess of light." Or in the words of another Apostle, when seeing through a glass darkly gives way to seeing face to face, because "faith hope and love abide, but the greatest of these is love."

    1. The Echoes Return Slow, MacMillan, 1988, page 69.

    (The photo was taken on the Aberdeen beach, the seagull obligingly posing on the horizon)

  • A community knowingly grounded in God’s love. 

    Always, I return to Walter Brueggemann when I need a shove. We all need someone to motivate us towards continuing and keeping going, to restore faith resilience and frayed hopes, to make us pay more attention to what in heaven's name the church is for!

    "The church as an alternative community in the world is not a 'volunteer association', and accident of human preference. The church as a wedge of newness, as a foretaste of what is coming, as a home for the odd ones, is the work of God's sovereign mercy. For all its distortedness, the church peculiarly hosts God's power for life."

    "Imagine any community without a church. For it is that odd community, knowingly grounded in God's love, that persistently raises human questions of neighbour justice, and that persistently enacts and answer to these questions in love and care."

    "The church in a quite specific way is the place where large dreams are entertained, songs are sung, boundaries are crossed, hurt is noticed, and the weak are honoured. The church has no monopoly on these matters,. Its oddity, however, is that it takes this agenda as its peculiar and primary business. In all sorts of unnoticed places, it is the church that raises the human questions." 

    (Texts Under Negotiation. The Bible and Postmodern Imagination. Fortress press, 1993, pages 36-37)

    IMG_5469There is an optimism all through those sentences. I know, the church doesn't always live up to those demanding words. But when it does it comes close to that astonishingly grace-laden metaphor, that the church is the Body of Christ.

    And by the way, Dietrich Bonhoeffer for one, took that metaphor far more seriously than mere metaphor. When Paul said, "You are the Body of Christ", he was saying something far more demanding, radical and realistic than the children's-talk banality of "And that's a bit like Jesus!"

    Not merely, "Your are like the Body of Christ"; not even "You are to strive to be like the Body of Christ". To use the more technical term, ontologically, in reality, as a matter of fact, "You are the Body of Christ."

    For Bonhoeffer the Pauline maxim means, the church is Christ existing as community. Where the church gathers in every location and time, the risen Christ by his own Word and promise, is in the midst as the one who animates, guides and gives the community its identity and character as, in reality, the Body of Christ.

    All of that is implied in Brueggemann's words, and provides the theological sub-structure of the church's ministry and mission, or its mission of ministry. The church raises, as Jesus invariably did and does, the human questions of justice and neighbourliness, of reconciliation and peace, of welcome and friendship, hospitality and love. When the church fails in this mission of ministry, it weakens its identity, and needs to hear again the upward call of God in Christ Jesus, "You are the Body of Christ, and individually members of it." Jesus' agenda is "the church's peculiar and primary business." 

    In that sense, every church business meeting should have an agenda shaped by what we believe ourselves to be. "We are the Body of Christ". Now. Here. So what is it that we should be doing? If this church is Christ living through this community what should we give our energy, money, time and abilities to?

    I think in those sentences above, Brueggemann points us to some of the essential life-giving oddities of Christian commitment. They could quite easily be turned into prayers for guidance, and prayers of intercession, by a community "knowingly grounded in God's love." 

  • The Importance of the Arts as Educators of Our Culture.

    Chicago Symphony Orchestra, Maestro Muti Sets Orchestra Hall on Fire With  Prokofiev Symphony | Chicago News | WTTW
     
    “A symphony orchestra today costs less than a football player, what legacy do we expect to leave to our children? Culture doesn't exist to make profit, it exists to educate. If this doesn’t change, in future generations superficial and very dangerous people will prevail”.
    Richard Muti
     
    I agree with Muti in all kinds of ways, but offer two thoughts.
     
    First, culture is not a one way exchange – culture exists to educate, but that culture is founded on values either humane or less humane, and therefore on an agreed ethic. What happens when a culture's ethical values move from human wellbeing as priority, to economic profit and power as priority? One consequence is that such a culture perpetuates the very values that makes for dangerous people.
     
    My second thought is about the importance therefore of those who are counter-cultural for the sake of improving the prevailing culture. Critique of cultural goals, norms and priorities is one of the most important tasks of the musician, artist, poet, and indeed all for whom human values of common good and community building, of compassion and respect for persons. How do we influence that which a culture educates us towards, and when necessary help recover an ethic for human flourishing?
     
    To return to Muti and why he is so right – our current culture is precisely the one now fine tuned to produce dangerous people.