Blog

  • Luther King House, Sean the Baptist, Fireworks, Barack Obama and Bonhoeffer.

    Going to Manchester for a few days to visit our friends at Luther King House Manchester, home of Northern Baptist College. Looking forward to good conversation with Sean, Richard, Anne and Glen (and anybody else who feels like a good blether with a sabbaticaling Scot).

    6a00d8341cd50253ef00e55009d3118833-150wi
    Bloggers  and blog readers will be up to date with the promised departure of Sean the Baptist to sunny Ozzie in early 2009. When I heard the news it seemed like a good reason to spend a while in good company before distance becomes problematic! (According to mapcrow.info Sean will be 10,496.09 miles excactly from Heathrow!) As an added bonus I get to stay with Sean and his family, and share the fireworks party, which is to double as a victory celebration for Barack Obama. Tonight I mean to stay up way, way, way, beyond my bedtime (usually 10.30'ish – but then I'm up just as other bloggers are going to bed.), at least till it becomes clear that the polls are near enough right.

    Amongst the good things I have in common with Sean is indebtedness to the thought and life of Dietrcih Bonhoeffer. I'm going to post a couple of times over the weekend on some of what Bonhoeffer has had me thinking and praying about as, reading some of his work, I've tried to wrestle with the question that centred all his theological and ethical explorations – Who is Jesus Christ for us today? Amongst the many responses he offered to this searching and sifting question:

    'God revealed in the flesh', the God-man Jesus Christ, is the holy mystery which theology is appointed to guard. What a mistake to think that it is the task of theology to unravel God's mystery, to bring it down to the flat, ordinary human wisdom of experience and reason! It is the task of theology solely to preserve God's wonder as wonder, to understand, to defend, to glorify God's mystery as mystery.
    (Quoted in G Kelly and F B Nelson, A Testament to Freedom: The Essential Writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1990), 472

  • Scottish Spirituality: Horatius Bonar, Victorian hymns and contemporary praise songs

    Horatius_bonar
    The fierce Scottish presbyterian minister in the photo is Horatius
    Bonar (1808-1889). The Bonars were like a Presbyterian theological dynasty in
    Victorian Scotland. Horatius studied under Thomas Chalmers, Andrew
    edited Rutherford's Letters and the life of Robert Murray McCheyne, and
    other members of the Bonar family served the Kirk and then the Free
    Kirk as distinguished ministers.

    Horatius
    Bonar
    was a popular devotional writer and one of Scotland's most
    prolific hymn writers. Some of his hymns are too sentimental, allowing
    emotion to dominate responses and eclipse the place of thoughtful
    doxology, weakening any literary impact as verse, and diluting that
    theological force which at its best in a good hymn both educates and
    inspires. Others were occasional and read now like what they
    are – poems so historically and contextually specific to their age that
    a later age lacks the right interpetive keys and needs to go looking
    for them. Others are long, theologically ponderous and even at times
    tedious in the writer's anxiety to spell out spiritual truth with
    serious devotional intent. But when Bonar's hymns are good, they are
    amongst the best. I reckon I've read most of the 600 or so he wrote,
    some of them only once! But some of them repeatedly, and several of
    them I think are so important they couldn't be displaced from the
    singing tradition of the Church in Scotland without serious deficit.

    Jesus japan
    I say in Scotland, for Bonar's hymns reflect the deep piety of Reformed
    Calvinism of a very Scottish flavour, fired by theologically principled
    ecclesial disruption, shaped into verse which is unembarrassed in its
    use of Scottish idiom, and focused on Christ the Redeemer King who
    alone is Head of the Church and whose rights are supreme above all
    other claimants. His best hymns percolated into the hymnbooks
    of other denominations, though I suspect they are slowly but surely
    disappearing from use, even in Scotland. That's a pity. A Christian
    spiritual tradition at its healthiest has an enduring respect for those
    figures of the past, both great and unknown, whose piety and lived
    faith gives biographical shape to the faith. Yes the reformed church is
    always being reformed, and therefore changing and welcoming change, but
    with the qualification that Jesus Christ is the same, yesterday, today
    and forever. And yes, those convictions about the sufficiency of Christ
    and the claims of His Gospel, forged for Bonar in the heat of Victorian
    scientific optimism colliding with pious triumphalism, have ongoing
    life-giving significance for the church today and always. But only when
    they are translated into convictional practices valid for a church
    seeking to be faithful to Christ, now, in a postmodern,
    post-Christendom, pluralist society where consumer capitalism, not
    Christian conviction, is the primary social and spiritual driver.
    Christ, who is not time-bound, dares us to follow Him, learning from
    the past and from the communion of saints, demands that together we
    discern His mind for us now, and trusting the One in whom all things
    hold together, invites us to accompany Him into that future which is
    the coming of God. Yesterday, today, forever – Jesus Christ the same –
    but those who follow Him do so in the changing contingencies,
    challenging contexts, and moral perplexities, of our own and the
    world's history.  

    So
    yes, as disciples of Jesus we need now more than ever, hymns and other
    sung resources for contemporary worship, which reflect our contemporary
    malaise and our contemporary hopes, our contemporary anxieties and our
    contemporary search for peace, and which put into words and thought a
    faith resonant with the huge cultural shifts we are living through. But
    the word contemporary is a risky word, a word habitually dismissive of
    past insights, and easily overused as in the last sentence. But it is
    an important word, a reminder of how time bound we all are, and that
    our life together, our being time bound together, in this unstable and
    "fluxing" society, provides the context where we are now, in our own
    time, to hear Christ's call to follow faithfully after him. (Footnote:
    I owe the effectively descriptive word "fluxing" to Stuart.)

    In
    worship I want hymns / praise songs / worship songs to encourage,
    envisage, enable such faithful following. Hymns that help me bear with
    the hard questions, because they are soaked with Gospel; hymns that
    know how to tell the triumph of the cross without the pretences of a
    discordant triumphalism; hymns that gather up Gospel grace and
    unsearchable riches of love, and help me behold the beauty and glory of
    that Triune community of love Who embraces the universe with mercy
    that is eternal in its faithfulness. I long for worship songs that
    don't forever encourage me to tell God what I feel about God, but
    enable me to respond from my deepest being to John 3.16 and Romans
    8.38-39, which amongst other things are telling what God in Christ
    feels about all human beings, and why that mighty love is to be
    trusted. And if we must insist on "praise songs" as an alternative to
    "hymns", then let's also have "response songs"; songs that through the
    beauty of language and image, express certainties but don't forbid
    hesitations, celebrate beauty wherever it is found and lament and
    resist ugliness, and with equal passion let me sing songs that don't leave me
    hymning my own emotions, but invite me to share in the communal act of
    saying thank you to the great Giver of Gifts who is himself the Gift.

    All
    of which, by a long and circuitous route, brings me back to Horatius
    Bonar. Whatever else the church today is called to be and do, it
    remains a baptised community centred on Christ and gathered round the
    table of communion, in company with God and with each other. And one of
    the hymns that best expresses the individual Christian's response to
    that gathering around the Lord's Supper is Bonar's "Here O my Lord, I
    see Thee face to face". Like much else in his writing, Bonar isn't so
    strong on the communal or the catholic (in the sense of universal). But
    in this hymn Bonar describes, and through the description invites, face
    to face encounter between the believer and Jesus, through actions
    perfomed together, of bread broken, wine poured out. The hymn is nearly always
    edited and the verses rearranged – acts of sympathetic improvement
    because in its original form it is disjointed. I've copied the original
    below – for myself, it has long been one of the prayers I have open at
    communion – if there's a hymn-book! That has it in it!!

    The
    photo (above) of "The Hymns of Faith and Hope" is of the copy of
    Bonar's hymns I picked up in a wee secondhand shop a week or two ago, for the
    price of a fish supper! It's a bit worn, but dated 1876, when they knew
    how to make a book that would last, and would be worth keeping more
    than a century later.

    Here, O my Lord, I see thee face to face;
    here would I touch and handle things unseen;
    here grasp with firmer hand eternal grace,
    and all my weariness upon thee lean.

    This is the hour of banquet and of song;
    this is the heavenly table spread for me;
    here let me feast, and feasting, still prolong
    the hallowed hour of fellowship with thee.

    Here would I feed upon the Bread of God,
    here drink with thee the royal Wine of heaven;
    here would I lay aside each earthly load,
    here taste afresh the calm of sin forgiven.

    I have no help but thine; nor do I need
    another arm save thine to lean upon;
    it is enough, my Lord, enough indeed;
    my strength is in thy might, thy might alone.

    Mine is the sin, but thine the righteousness:
    mine is the guilt, but thine the cleansing blood
    here is my robe, my refuge, and my peace;
    thy Blood, thy righteousness, O Lord my God!

    Feast after feast thus comes and passes by;
    yet, passing, points to the glad feast above,
    giving sweet foretaste of the festal joy,
    the Lamb's great bridal feast of bliss and love.

    Posted By Jim Gordon

  • Care for creation, red rowans and the resident robin.

    Page-robin
    The time of year when the garden and the front drive needs tidying up. The front drive is overhung by the neighbours big rowan tree, which in the past month has been laden with berries most of which have now fallen on our side; and the car going in and out squishes and squashes them.

    So Sheila, whose enthusiasm for the garden at least matches mine for books, goes out to brush them up, along with the leaves, shovels them into the brown wheelie bin. Job done. But at a price.

    Never occurred to me before. Once she had the large pile of berries brushed up the resident robin arrived and looked askance at the sheer waste of all that food. The bird was within touching distance, was pretty agitated, and persisted in flitting around the heap of berries. I can imagine the inner outrage of this small bundle of energy that shares the garden with us.

    "Just because you human beings like a tidy drive. How on God's earth can robins plan for a sustainable future if you human beings clean all the food up with your massive industrial sized bristle brushes, eh? What harm a few hundred berries under your feet? A bird weighing 100g could live a long time on a couple of kilos of rowan berries. Not even making them into rowan jelly – just binning them. It isn't the berries that are out of place – it's your precious lock block.!"


    The reprimand from the resident robin heeded, we will in future leave the berries alone – well at least for a good bit longer. Apart from anything else, the swallow and the sparrow find a home in the house of God – brought up in the farms both birds were familiar sights all through my childhood. And no sparrow falls but the Father notices. And while Jesus spoke of the birds of the air not being anxious, and being provided for – he probably wasn't thinking of what might happen to the birds when with our hoover it all up mentality we thoughtlesly bin their food, and relentlessly interfere with the wellbeing of life around us.

    BTW, this post is under the category justice and righteousness in the hope that in trying to be faithful in caring for the small things, I might be more alert to the big things also needing attentive re-thinking, seeing as how my life is lived as only one interested party in a world crowded with equally precious 'others'. 

    Emily Dickinson says something similar about developing a humane ecology:

    If I can stop one Heart from breaking
    I shall not live in vain
    If I can ease one Life the Aching
    or cool one Pain

    Or help one fainting Robin
    into his Nest again
    I shall not live in vain

    Poem 982, The Poems of Emily Dickinson, (ed), R W Franklin, (harvard: Bellknap, 1998), 414.

  • Brand, Ross, the BBC and the ethical boundaries of humour

    1576871487_01_PT01__SS400_SCLZZZZZZZ_V1140649280_
    The furore over that broadcast by Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross has several subsidiary themes worth a second thought. The following are my second thoughts, offered for reflection and not pushed as anything other than how I think and feel about all this.

    Much is made of the fact that the night of the broadcast only 1 complaint was registered, with a few more the next day. Then a tabloid paper ran the story as front page news and the complaint count took off. By last night, with Brand's resignation and Ross's suspension confirmed and the Radio Two controller resigned, the tally reached 30,000+. This has led to a backlash suggesting that since most of those complaining hadn't heard the broadcast, and never listen to the programme, their sense of offence is hypocrisy and their complaints invalid.

    Sorry. But having had full and unchallenged reports on the BBC itself of what WAS said, and to whom, and that it was broadcast, comes as information that entitles any responsible person to challenge the morality, even the legality, of such misjudgement of taste. When would an episode of suggestive crudity and thoughtless comment on potential suicide EVER be acceptable? And in what other circumstances could such a series of messages be left on an answering machine without incurring prosecution?

    Further. Even if this episode had not been broadcast – what thought was ever given to how such messages on an answering machine would be received by an elderly man who had made the mistake of agreeing to particpate in a show sponsored by the supposedly responsible, publicly funded BBC? Sure the Controller had to resign for approving the broadcast. But had it not been broadcast then presumably that was to be the end of the affair. Not sure that's how I feel – I expect at least a minimal awareness in those entrusted with an audience of millions, of the impact on any individual subjected to their particular brand of 'pushing the edges' comedy. Did no one even consider the possibility that a Grandfather might be offended, and a young woman humiliated, by explicit and obscene references to her sex life? 

    It is also claimed that it is all about audience. A quick poll of audiences queuing up for BBC recording of programmes revealed a sharp distinction between those attending Never Mind the Buzzcocks and a more sedate crowd queuing for a much less 'pushing the edges' programme. The Buzzcocks folks were unanimous in their opinion that the broadcast was not offensive, and that we all needed to lighten up, and that if you don't like the content of the programme no one forces you to listen to it. But that also ignored the fact that people are victims of such brutal humour, and that the audience's laughter is at someone's expense, which should always be within acceptable moral and humane limits. It also betrays a too often forgotten feature of humour; frequently one of its key components is cruelty, the capacity, even the compulsuon, to laugh at someone else's hurt. Thomas Hobbes that bleak realist was not wrong when he defined laughter as the grimaces of the face when we witness the misfortune of someone else.

    Then there is the claim that the furore was all about salary envy. Jonathan Ross is paid £6 million a year to work two days a week for the BBC. To require extremely high standards of professionalism, maturity and reliability in enhancing the reputation of his employer seems to me to be a reasonable, even minimal ask for such a salary. Whether any TV celebrity fronting a twice weekly programme is worth an amount per annum that would pay 240 nurses' salaries is a separate matter. Salary envy is a rather hard charge against those who complained since the BBC is in fact a public service, funded by its own audiences, and is therefore publicly accountable. That public called it to account this week. Implied in that accountability are questions about the judgement of those who agreed to pay such a salary, and who when it went wrong took over a week to deal decisively with it.

    All of which said – I listened to all of Russell Brand's statement of apology, and recognise the genuine remorse he expressed. No similar public statement has yet been released by Jonathan Ross. The codes of discipline and professional standards in broadcasting are hard to get right. I for one don't want humour, comedy, satire to be so domesticated that they lose their capacity for important social critique, as important vehicles for presenting alternative perspectives, and their long history of subverting assumptions that can often be oppressive, bigoted, abusive. What they must not do, and certainly not on public broadcasts, is make people targets for precisely that abusive and humiliating ridicule which diminishes and degrades, so that laughter becomes a way of desensitising our humanity.I don't think that was the intent of either the two comedians or the Radio Two Controller – but that they seemed unaware of that consequence suggest the need for some education on the ethical boundaries of humour.

  • Thanksgiving Conference for Thomas Torrance

    Full.1065501280808nemway1
    Yesterday I spent the day in two places – the M8 and New College, Edinburgh. I was four and a half hours on the M8 and 7 hours in New College attending the Thomas F Torrance Thanksgiving Conference. And the 7 hours in new College made the 270+ minutes on the M8 well worth it.
    But just to make sure blog visitors appreciate the rhetorical force of the comparison, the M8 without roadworks is like a slow release anxiety enhancer. The M8 with roadworks you have a choice – be miserable, be very miserable, or make sure you have good conversation partners in the car and a stack of your favourite CD's. Yesterday I had both.

    On the way there in Andrew's car, the state of the central artery road system provided Graeme and I with an endless supply of discouraging and demoralising comment. Andrew's sanctification levels have thereby been considerably augmented. 

    On the way home, driving my own car which has been having a holiday with Aileen, I discovered some of her CD's including a supply of Johnny Cash. The mixture of snarling defiance and sentimental regret, sung by one of the greatest Country performers of my generation kept my own levels of sanctification at least this side of going subterranean!

    And it was worth it for the following reasons
    I met Jason Goroncy, my virtual and blogging friend and now I can call him a real friend whose face I recognise, whose voice and accent I recognise, and who unfortunately is leaving Scotland for New Zealand three weeks after actually meeting me.. though I'm assured the move has been planned for some time.

    At the conference I met and spoke with several others including a Church of Scotland minister from Cyprus who is a friend of Steve Chalke, which led to interesting discussion about Torrance on Atonement; a retired minister who experienced Torrance's lectures halfway through his degree (1949-52), and whose preaching had been sustained by fires ignited over two brief years of Torrance dogmatics; Robin, a key player in Paternoster publications and someone whose theological awareness of 'what's going on' and 'what works' is both impressive and generously shared; Stuart the Edinburgh post-grad (not my Word from the Barricades friend and colleague), with whom I shared coffee, brief discussion of high falutin theology and memories of standing together at Hampden on that Saturday when Queen of the South gubeed Aberdeen 4-3; several other friends I already knew but had a chance to talk to while juggling a plate of chicken tikka sandwiches, a cup of coffee and a mini choc muffin!

    Torrance_185x360_253295a
    Registered members were given a complementary copy of Torrances new book on the Incarnation, beautifully produced by Paternoster / IVP, and already slotted in to be my main reading during Advent in a month's time – on which I'll blog. This, and a second volume on Atonement to be issued next year, contains much of Torrance's lectures on dogmatics, revised and rewritten over the years and now issued to a wider audience, edited by Bob Walker who is uniquely qualified to do this sympathetically, thoroughly and as one who knows the peculiar excellencies of Torrance's mature theology.

    Then there were the papers, all of them good, a couple of them outstanding, and at least one contribution from a recently retired minister that was deeply moving and reminded me how it could be that any of us ever thought we might just be able, by the grace of God, to preach such a Gospel, serve Christ in his Church, and express in pastoral care the self-giving love of the Triune God, incarnate in Christ crucified and risen, and actively redemptive throughout Creation, in the power of the Spirit. 

    The epilogue to such a full day was a Pizza and Wispa night watching the fitba with my son Andrew, home from Uni and reminding me of the importance of self-indulgence. As if…..

  • “The Sunday School Treat”

    Tit new back

    This post is for the benefit of Lynn "who works with children", recently decanted to Edinburgh, and who visits this blog and occasionally comments. During our visit to Cornwall Sheila and I visited Penlee House in Penzance and in the art gallery I was fascinated by this picture. It is of an early Sunday school trip, and is an important and early piece of social documentation of what became for many years a highlight of children's lives.

    The painting is called "The Sunday School Treat", and the artist was W H Y Titcomb, one of the Newry school of Cornish artists who flourished in the late Victorian period. This painting shows how Sunday School treats were done on the Cornish coast and estuaries. Despite the unfashionable subject matter some of Titcomb's best paintings document religious themes such as Primtive Methodist prayer meetings, pastoral care of the dying, and the prayer and devotions of the Cornish fishermen. Incidentally Thomas Cook started his travel business by organising day trips on trains (with food included) for Sunday Schools and Temperance gatherings.

    Now Lynn – with all the health and safety, risk assessment, child protection and other essential legislative safeguards, I don't suppose we're ever likely to see the likes of these outings again. Anyway – it's so idyllic I thought I'd share it to encourage you and and all those whose ministry and vocational gifts are poured into the high energy demands of working with children. I reckon Jesus probably put such ministry into the higher echelons of good long term Kingdom building.

  • “Scottish Baptist Theological Study Group” – who are they when they’re at home?

    In yesterdays post (below) I mentioned the inaugural meeting of what I called 'The Baptist Theological Study Group'.

    A fuller post at the College blog prompted several questions from Margaret which make it important to clarify what is envisaged. Here is Margaret's comment / questions, and the response I posted on the College blog. I am answering only for myself as the occasion is being organised by Andrew Rollinson – but in our conversations about it I have a good idea of what Andrew is envisaging and hoping for.

    Margaret

    "What's the Scottish Baptist
    Theological Study Group? Where and when do they meet? Who is "in the
    group"? How do you get to be "in the group"? Just curious….."

    My reply

    The
    name is provisional Margaret – and likely to change because it's hard
    to avoid words like 'group', 'society', but they have a kind of closed
    feel to them that is entirely unintended.

    The initial meeting was set up by Andrew Rollinson, our Ministry Advisor at the Baptist Union of Scotland, by an email
    circular inviting expressions of interest – not sure who was on that
    first list. But the intention is to get such a discussion forum under way and make it into
    an inclusive place for creative reflection, responsible discussion and
    respectful listening about issues and themes important for the ongoing
    life and health of Baptist thought and practice.

    At this first meeting, as well as the lecture, we hope a broader
    discussion will help clarify what we want to be about, and how best to
    develop through thoughtful, informed discussion together, Baptist ways
    of thought and practice that arise out of such a process of theological
    reflection.

    So I guess the invitation is to all those who are open to and
    supportive of the intended ethos of "an inclusive place for creative
    reflection, responsible discussion and respectful listening about
    issues and themes important for the ongoing life and health of Baptist
    thought and practice". At this stage it is only being initiated – what
    it becomes will largely be determined by those who want to make this
    journey together.

    My personal conviction is that such a shared journey can only be taken if the journey itself is inclusive and welcoming, accessible and jargon free, contextually sensitive but challenging, and therefore enabling practice which arises out of shared learning 'in the school of Christ'; and that such a journey of learning and discovery means our willingness to travel together in conversation, companionship, and commitment to live together  'under the rule of Christ'. 

    Hope that helps with the 'just curious' questions –
    for which many thanks!

  • Dimensions of Baptist Spirituality: Under the Rule of Christ.

    It's here. Just received in the post my copies of the most recent Regent Study Guide entitled Under the Rule of Christ. Dimensions of Baptist Spirituality, Paul Fiddes (Ed.), Smyth and Helwys, 2008 (ISBN: 978-095397 – 4-1). The book arose out of a request from the Baptist Union Retreat Group to the UK College Principals to write something on spirituality amongst Baptists. The result was a series of papers which we wrote, reviewed together, revised in the light of our discussions, and then offered for publication.

    Here's the blurb from the publisher

    Regents_14_cvr_lg
    In this book the Principals of the six Baptist colleges in Great
    Britain take up a request to write about Baptist spirituality. They
    propose that the spirituality of Baptists, in all its diversity, is
    characterized by living ‘under the rule of Christ’. While all Christian
    spiritual traditions affirm this truth, they suggest that there is a
    particular sense of being under Christ’s rule which has been shaped by
    the story of Baptists and by their way of being church through the
    centuries. Elaborating the main theme, chapters explore various
    dimensions of spirituality: giving attention to God and to others,
    developing spirituality through suffering, having spiritual liberty
    within a community, living under the rule of the Word in Christ and
    scripture, integrating the Lord’s Supper with the whole of life, and
    engaging in the mission of God from an experience of grace. Together,
    the writers present an understanding of prayer and life in which Christ
    is both the final authority and the
    measure of all things.

    Chris Ellis is Principal Emeritus of Bristol Baptist College; Paul Fiddes is Principal of Regent’s Park College, Oxford; Steven Finamore is Principal of Bristol Baptist College; James Gordon is Principal of the Scottish Baptist College, Glasgow; Richard Kidd is Principal of Northern Baptist College, Manchester; John Weaver is Principal of the South Wales Baptist College, Cardiff; Nigel Wright is Principal of Spurgeon’s Baptist College, London.

    Ive a lot more to say about the Bible, Baptist principles and Baptist spirituality on the College blog here. You can find it just after the publisher's blurb. There is a big conversation to be had about what it means to be Baptist in such a distinctive way that it actually makes baptist people distinctive! Such distinctiveness doesn't necessarily make baptists more right, more spiritual, more theologically sound – it does indicate what it is we are called to be, and to be faithful to, within the diversity of the church universal.

  • Life returning to a more bearable abnormal – SPOOKS is back!

    Sub Prime Mortgages. The run on Northern Rock. Credit Crunch. HBOS takeover. Major Banks bail out. Recession inevitable. The sequence of significant moments affecting the future welfare of the planet since last year, hasn't finished yet.

    51jdPdR7I+L._SL500_AA240_
    But, some of us who live on more than one level of unreality will find with apologies to Boethius, The Consolation of Spooks. The scarily plausible, brilliantly acted Spooks are back.

    I have every intention of marking the occasion with whatever calorie laden sweetie I fancy at 9.00pm Monday night. And for the next 10 weeks there will be at least one TV programme I can be sure posits a worse case scenario than is being painted for the global financial markets – I think.

  • “here’s tae us, wha’s like us” – Is there a Scottish spirituality?

     Tartan_shirts_
    Durrow%20Cross

    An area of increasing interest for me is the way a spiritual tradition grows out of its native soil, and takes on the characteristics of its environment. The question of what is distinctive, even unique, in a spiritual tradition depends on the particularities of context – historical, political, cultural, religious – perhaps even geographical.

    The term "Scottish piety" (not sure about the continuing usefulness of the ubiquitous descriptor "spirituality") needs some clarifying.
    Is there a uniquely Scottish stream of Christian faith as it has been experienced, thought and lived? If so what gives Scottish piety its distinctive flavour?
    What in the Scottish context, over centuries, shaped and gave specific Scottish content to Christianity in Scotland, as through processes of revolution and evolution, it developed and changed?

    And what is meant by piety? In Scotland, amongst other things the impact of religious experience, doctrinal developments and doctrinal fixity, the role of the Kirk in discipline, worship, liturgy and community and people's experience of all of these. But also the relation of people to Bible, prayer, preaching and the hard to measure extent that such piety and faith exerted on and influenced daily life.

    All of this – but even then, "Scottish piety" remains unsatisfactory as a catch-all. For Scotland itself has a religious history and representation as varied as its own georgraphical landscape – Prebyterian and Catholic, Episcopal and Dissenting, Highland and Lowland, West and East – and in all this variety a gift of fractiousness that made fragmentation inevitable, bringing both blessing and loss.

    The research part of my current sabbatical is focusing on how to explore all this in a way that will help Scottish Christians to 'look to the rock from which we are hewn". Such an exercise involves a long ponder about what in our tradition, our way of following Christ, is of lasting significance and value, what can be appropriated and what now needs to be relinquished, in order to clarify what faithful following of Christ means in contemporary Scotland. If context is decisive in how a tradition is formed, it is also decisive in how that tradition changes, adapts and stays healthy. Quite straightforward really – not!

    A subsidiary interest is the way Scottish Baptist communities have emerged, developed, declined and yet continue to feature within the Scottish ecclesial landscape. Again, the focus of my personal interest is the way Scottish Baptists have experienced, thought and lived out their way of following Christ. The suggestion there is such a disctinctive thing as "Scottish Baptist piety" might be even more contentious. And for that very reason even more interesting, as a route to self-understanding and renewal for communities sharing in the experience of decline, and badly needing to recover confidence in a Gospel which never promised us a rose garden – or an assured place at any table, political or religious, other than the one where bread is broken and broken hearts are healed.

    Anyway, that's what I'm about these days.